Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 63 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 106 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 197 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 440 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Measurement of $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow π^{+}π^{-}ψ(3686)$ from 4.008 to 4.600$\sim$GeV and observation of a charged structure in the $π^{\pm}ψ(3686)$ mass spectrum (1703.08787v4)

Published 26 Mar 2017 in hep-ex

Abstract: We study the process $e{+}e{-} \rightarrow \pi{+}\pi{-}\psi(3686)$ using 5.1 $fb{-1}$ of data collected at 16 center-of-mass energy ($\sqrt{s}$) points from 4.008 to 4.600$\sim$GeV by the BESIII detector operating at the BEPCII collider. The measured Born cross sections for $e{+}e{-}\rightarrow \pi{+}\pi{-}\psi(3686)$ are consistent with previous results, but with much improved precision. A fit to the cross section shows contributions from two structures: the first has $M=4209.5\pm7.4\pm1.4$$\sim$MeV/$c{2}$ and $\Gamma=80.1\pm24.6\pm2.9$$\sim$MeV, and the second has $M=4383.8\pm4.2\pm0.8$$\sim$MeV/c${2}$ and $\Gamma=84.2\pm12.5\pm2.1$$\sim$MeV, where the first errors are statistical and the second systematic. The lower-mass resonance is observed in the process $e{+}e{-}\rightarrow \pi{+}\pi{-}\psi(3686)$ for the first time with a statistical significance of $5.8\sigma$. A charged charmonium-like structure is observed in the $\pi{\pm}\psi(3686)$ invariant mass spectrum for data at $\sqrt{s} = 4.416~$GeV. A fit with an $S$-wave Breit-Wigner function yields a mass $M=4032.1\pm2.4$~$MeV${2}$, where the errors are statistical only. However, there are still unresolved discrepancies between the fit model and data. The width of the intermediate state varies in a wide range for different kinematic regions within the data set. Therefore no simple interpretation of the data has been found, and a future data sample with larger statistics and more theoretical input will be required to better understand this issue.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.