Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Exponential Independence

Published 19 May 2016 in math.CO | (1605.05991v1)

Abstract: For a set $S$ of vertices of a graph $G$, a vertex $u$ in $V(G)\setminus S$, and a vertex $v$ in $S$, let ${\rm dist}{(G,S)}(u,v)$ be the distance of $u$ and $v$ in the graph $G-(S\setminus { v})$. Dankelmann et al. (Domination with exponential decay, Discrete Math. 309 (2009) 5877-5883) define $S$ to be an exponential dominating set of $G$ if $w{(G,S)}(u)\geq 1$ for every vertex $u$ in $V(G)\setminus S$, where $w_{(G,S)}(u)=\sum\limits_{v\in S}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right){{\rm dist}{(G,S)}(u,v)-1}$. Inspired by this notion, we define $S$ to be an exponential independent set of $G$ if $w{(G,S\setminus { u})}(u)<1$ for every vertex $u$ in $S$, and the exponential independence number $\alpha_e(G)$ of $G$ as the maximum order of an exponential independent set of $G$. Similarly as for exponential domination, the non-local nature of exponential independence leads to many interesting effects and challenges. Our results comprise exact values for special graphs as well as tight bounds and the corresponding extremal graphs. Furthermore, we characterize all graphs $G$ for which $\alpha_e(H)$ equals the independence number $\alpha(H)$ for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$, and we give an explicit characterization of all trees $T$ with $\alpha_e(T)=\alpha(T)$.

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.