Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 72 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 57 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 43 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 219 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Bouncing Cosmologies: Progress and Problems (1603.05834v2)

Published 18 Mar 2016 in hep-th, astro-ph.CO, gr-qc, and hep-ph

Abstract: We review the status of bouncing cosmologies as alternatives to cosmological inflation for providing a description of the very early universe, and a source for the cosmological perturbations which are observed today. We focus on the motivation for considering bouncing cosmologies, the origin of fluctuations in these models, and the challenges which various implementations face.

Citations (376)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

  • The paper presents bouncing cosmologies as viable alternatives to inflation by replacing the initial singularity with a bounce mechanism.
  • It examines different models, including the matter bounce, ekpyrotic, and string gas scenarios, to achieve a scale-invariant spectrum of perturbations.
  • It highlights challenges such as instabilities and the need for physics beyond General Relativity to successfully implement the bounce.

Bouncing Cosmologies: Progress and Problems

The paper "Bouncing Cosmologies: Progress and Problems" by Robert Brandenberger and Patrick Peter presents a comprehensive review of bouncing cosmologies as viable alternatives to cosmological inflation, focusing on their ability to describe the early universe and generate cosmological perturbations observed today. The authors address the motivations behind considering bouncing cosmologies, the mechanics of fluctuation generation in these models, and the challenges they encounter.

Motivation for Bouncing Cosmologies

The inflationary scenario, despite resolving several issues of the Standard Big Bang cosmology and achieving empirical success, faces conceptual problems, such as the singularity and trans-Planckian problems. Inflation implies a singularity preceding its start, and sub-Planckian perturbation wavelengths raise trust issues in quantum gravity. Bouncing cosmologies, which replace the initial singularity with a bounce, are proposed to circumvent these issues.

Theoretical Considerations

Various models exist within bouncing cosmologies:

  1. Matter Bounce: This scenario features a contracting phase with a matter-like equation of state before the bounce, producing scale-invariant perturbations similar to inflation.
  2. Pre-Big-Bang and Ekpyrotic Models: Originating from string theory perspectives, these models propose an ekpyrotic contraction phase preceding the bounce. Scale-invariant perturbations are typically obtained through entropy fluctuations.
  3. String Gas Cosmology: Built on string theory principles, this model involves a quasi-static early universe where thermal fluctuations generate the cosmological perturbations naturally.

Mechanism of Perturbation Generation

In bouncing cosmologies, perturbations evolve causally from sub-Hubble to super-Hubble scales in a contracting universe, akin to what happens in an inflationary context. This evolution facilitates the generation of a scale-invariant spectrum of primordial fluctuations, which are essential for structure formation.

Challenges and Problems

Despite their appeal, bouncing cosmologies face numerous challenges:

  • Physical Realization: A critical challenge is the need for new physics to achieve the bounce itself, often requiring a departure from General Relativity (GR) or standard energy conditions (e.g., violating the Null Energy Condition (NEC)).
  • Instabilities: Bouncing models may suffer from instabilities such as anisotropies and the potential dominance of shear during the contraction phase.
  • Observational Signatures: While promising, these models need distinct observational predictions, different from inflation, to be empirically testable. Signature predictions involve non-Gaussianities, tensor-to-scalar ratio tests, and the potential for distinctive running of the spectral index.

Implications and Future Directions

If successfully reconciled with theoretical and observational constraints, bouncing cosmologies could provide valuable insights into problems associated with inflation and the nature of the early universe. Further developments in fundamental physics, particularly quantum gravity and string theory, could offer additional support and feasible mechanisms to achieve a bounce without conflicting with established physics. Bouncing cosmologies are not only a theoretical exploration but also offer potential for new cosmological paradigms that align with future empirical discoveries. They invite ongoing discussion about the universe's history and potential insights from alternative perspectives to inflationary cosmology.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com