Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A disconnected deformation space of rational maps

Published 24 Feb 2016 in math.DS | (1602.07378v1)

Abstract: Let $f:(\mathbb{P}1,P)\to(\mathbb{P}1,P)$ be a postcritically finite rational map with postcritical set $P$. William Thurston showed that $f$ induces a holomorphic pullback map $\sigma_f:\mathcal{T}_P\to\mathcal{T}_P$ on the Teichm\"uller space ${\mathcal T}_P:=\mathrm{Teich}(\mathbb{P}1,P)$. If $f$ is not a flexible Latt`es map, Thurston proved that $\sigma_f$ has a unique fixed point. In his PhD thesis, Adam Epstein generalized Thurston's ideas and defined a deformation space associated to a rational map $f:(\mathbb{P}1,A)\to (\mathbb{P}1,B)$ where $A \subseteq B$, allowing for maps $f$ which are not necessarily postcritically finite. By definition, the deformation space $\mathrm{Def}_BA(f)\subseteq \mathcal{T}_B$ is the locus where the pullback map $\sigma_f:\mathcal{T}_B\to\mathcal{T}_A$ and the forgetful map $\sigma_AB:\mathcal{T}_B\to\mathcal{T}_A$ agree. Using purely local arguments, Epstein showed that $\mathrm{Def}_BA(f)$ is a smooth analytic submanifold of $\mathcal{T}_B$ of dimension $|B-A|$. In this article, we investigate the question of whether $\mathrm{Def}_BA(f)$ is connected. We exhibit a family of quadratic rational maps for which the associated deformation spaces are disconnected; in fact, each has infinitely many components.

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.