Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Parameterized Lower Bounds and Dichotomy Results for the NP-completeness of $H$-free Edge Modification Problems (1509.08807v1)

Published 29 Sep 2015 in cs.DS

Abstract: For a graph $H$, the $H$-free Edge Deletion problem asks whether there exist at most $k$ edges whose deletion from the input graph $G$ results in a graph without any induced copy of $H$. $H$-free Edge Completion and $H$-free Edge Editing are defined similarly where only completion (addition) of edges are allowed in the former and both completion and deletion are allowed in the latter. We completely settle the classical complexities of these problems by proving that $H$-free Edge Deletion is NP-complete if and only if $H$ is a graph with at least two edges, $H$-free Edge Completion is NP-complete if and only if $H$ is a graph with at least two non-edges and $H$-free Edge Editing is NP-complete if and only if $H$ is a graph with at least three vertices. Additionally, we prove that, these NP-complete problems cannot be solved in parameterized subexponential time, i.e., in time $2{o(k)}\cdot |G|{O(1)}$, unless Exponential Time Hypothesis fails. Furthermore, we obtain implications on the incompressibility of these problems.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. N. R. Aravind (15 papers)
  2. R. B. Sandeep (17 papers)
  3. Naveen Sivadasan (14 papers)
Citations (9)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.