Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

An improvement of the general bound on the largest family of subsets avoiding a subposet

Published 25 Aug 2014 in math.CO | (1408.5783v2)

Abstract: Let La(n,P)La(n,P) be the maximum size of a family of subsets of [n]=1,2,...,n[n]= {1,2, ..., n } not containing PP as a (weak) subposet, and let h(P)h(P) be the length of a longest chain in PP. The best known upper bound for La(n,P)La(n,P) in terms of ∣P∣|P| and h(P)h(P) is due to Chen and Li, who showed that La(n,P)≤1m+1(∣P∣+12(m<sup>2</sup>+3m−2)(h(P)−1)−1)(n⌊n/2⌋)La(n,P) \le \frac{1}{m+1} \left(|P| + \frac{1}{2}(m<sup>2</sup> +3m-2)(h(P)-1) -1 \right) {\binom {n} {\lfloor n/2 \rfloor}} for any fixed m≥1m \ge 1. In this paper we show that La(n,P)≤12<sup>k−1</sup>(∣P∣+(3k−5)2<sup>k−2(h(P)−1)</sup>−1)(n⌊n/2⌋)La(n,P) \le \frac{1}{2<sup>{k-1}}</sup> (|P| + (3k-5)2<sup>{k-2}(h(P)-1)</sup> - 1 ) {n \choose {\lfloor n/2\rfloor} } for any fixed k≥2k \ge 2, improving the best known upper bound. By choosing kk appropriately, we obtain that La(n,P)=O(h(P)log⁡2(∣P∣h(P)+2))(n⌊n/2⌋)La(n,P) = O\left( h(P) \log_2\left(\frac{|P|}{h(P)}+2\right) \right) {n \choose \lfloor n/2 \rfloor } as a corollary, which we show is best possible for general PP. We also give a different proof of this corollary by using bounds for generalized diamonds. We also show that the Lubell function of a family of subsets of [n][n] not containing PP as an induced subposet is O(n<sup>c)O(n<sup>c) for every $c&gt;\frac{1}{2}$.

Citations (21)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.