Displacements
Abstract: Given a functor $p:E \rightarrow B$ and an object $e \in E$ , we define a \emph{displacement} of $e$ along a morphism $\varepsilon: p(e) \rightarrow b$, as a map $e \rightarrow \nabla_\varepsilon(e)$ satisfying a universal property analogue to that of a \emph{cocartesian lifting} (pushforward) \emph{`a la} B\'enabou-Grothendieck-Street. There are many difficulties in geometry that come from the fact that forgetful functors such as $p: Var(\mathbf{C}) \rightarrow Top $ don't have displacements of objects along arbitrary maps. And this can be already seen abstractly, since the existence of a left adjoint to $p$, can be reduced to the existence of all displacements of the initial object. However some \emph{schematization functors} exist as approximations. In a broader context, if $B$ is a model category and $p$ is a right adjoint, then the right-induced model category on $E$ exists if and only if all displacements along any trivial cofibration $\varepsilon$, are weak $p$-equivalences. In these notes we provide some categorical lemmas that will be necessary for future applications. The idea is to have a \emph{homotopy descent process} for \emph{elementary displacements} when $p$ has a \emph{presentation} as a $2$-pullback of a family ${p_i: E_i \rightarrow B}_{i\in J}$. When suitably applied it should lead to techniques similar to Mumford's GIT through homotopy theory (simplicial presheaves).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.