Comparing the strength of diagonally non-recursive functions in the absence of $Σ^0_2$ induction

Abstract: We prove that the statement "there is a $k$ such that for every $f$ there is a $k$-bounded diagonally non-recursive function relative to $f$" does not imply weak K\"onig's lemma over $\mathrm{RCA}_0 + \mathrm{B}\Sigma^0_2$. This answers a question posed by Simpson. A recursion-theoretic consequence is that the classic fact that every $k$-bounded diagonally non-recursive function computes a $2$-bounded diagonally non-recursive function may fail in the absence of $\mathrm{I}\Sigma^0_2$.