A Sufficient Condition for Disproving Descartes's Conjecture on Odd Perfect Numbers
Abstract: Let $\sigma(x)$ be the sum of the divisors of $x$. If $N$ is odd and $\sigma(N) = 2N$, then the odd perfect number $N$ is said to be given in Eulerian form if $N = {qk}{n2}$ where $q$ is prime with $q \equiv k \equiv 1 \pmod 4$ and $\gcd(q,n) = 1$. In this note, we show that $q < n$ implies that Descartes's conjecture (previously Sorli's conjecture), $k = \nu_{q}(N) = 1$, is not true. This then implies an unconditional proof for the biconditional $$k = \nu_{q}(N) = 1 \Longleftrightarrow n < q.$$ Lastly, following a recent result of Cohen and Sorli, we show that if $q < n$, then either $q > 5$ or $k > 5$ is true. (Note: This is withdrawn for now because this paper is currently a work in progress.)
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.