Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

The typical structure of sparse Kr+1K_{r+1}-free graphs

Published 23 Jul 2013 in math.CO | (1307.5967v2)

Abstract: Two central topics of study in combinatorics are the so-called evolution of random graphs, introduced by the seminal work of Erd\H{o}s and R\'enyi, and the family of HH-free graphs, that is, graphs which do not contain a subgraph isomorphic to a given (usually small) graph HH. A widely studied problem that lies at the interface of these two areas is that of determining how the structure of a typical HH-free graph with nn vertices and mm edges changes as mm grows from $0$ to ex(n,H)\text{ex}(n,H). In this paper, we resolve this problem in the case when HH is a clique, extending a classical result of Kolaitis, Pr\"omel, and Rothschild. In particular, we prove that for every r2r \ge 2, there is an explicit constant θr\theta_r such that, letting mr=θrn<sup>22r+2</sup>(logn)<sup>1/[(r+12)1]m_r = \theta_r n<sup>{2-\frac{2}{r+2}}</sup> (\log n)<sup>{1/\left[\binom{r+1}{2}-1\right]}, the following holds for every positive constant ε\varepsilon. If m(1+ε)mrm \ge (1+\varepsilon) m_r, then almost all Kr+1K_{r+1}-free nn-vertex graphs with mm edges are rr-partite, whereas if nm(1ε)mrn \ll m \le (1-\varepsilon)m_r, then almost all of them are not rr-partite.

Citations (13)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.