Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Revisiting charmless hadronic B decays to scalar mesons

Published 18 Mar 2013 in hep-ph and hep-ex | (1303.4403v1)

Abstract: Hadronic charmless B decays to scalar mesons are studied within the framework of QCD factorization (QCDF). Considering two different scenarios for scalar mesons above 1 GeV, we find that the data favor the scenario in which the scalars $a_0(1450)$ and $K_0*(1430)$ are the lowest lying $q\bar q$ bound states. This in turn implies a preferred four-quark nature for light scalars below 1 GeV. Assuming $K_0*(1430)$ being a lowest lying $q\bar s$ state, we show that the data of $B\to K_0*(1430)\eta{(')}$ and $B\to K_0*(1430)(\rho,\omega,\phi)$ can be accommodated in QCDF without introducing power corrections induced from penguin annihilation, while the predicted $B-\to \ov K_0{*0}(1430)\pi-$ and $\ov B0\to K_0{*-}(1430)\pi+$ are too small compared to experiment. In principle, the data of $K_0*(1430)\pi$ modes can be explained if penguin-annihilation induced power corrections are taken into account. However, this will destroy the agreement between theory and experiment for $B\to K_0*(1430)(\eta{(')},\rho,\omega,\phi)$. Contrary to the pseudoscalar meson sector where $B\to K\eta'$ has the largest rate in 2-body decays of the $B$ meson, we show that $Br(B\to K_0*\eta')<\B(B\to K_0*\eta)$. The decay $\ov B0\to a_0(980)+K-$ is found to have a rate much smaller than that of $\ov B0\to a_0(980)+\pi-$ in QCDF, while it is the other way around in pQCD. Experimental measurements of these two modes will help discriminate between these two different approaches. Assuming 2-quark bound states for $f_0(980)$ and $f_0(500)$, the observed large rates of $f_0(980)K$ and $f_0(980)K*$ modes can be explained in QCDF with the $f_0(980)!-!f_0(500)$ mixing angle $\theta$ in the vicinity of $20\circ$.

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.