Abstract: We investigate the relative complexity of the graph isomorphism problem (GI) and problems related to the reconstruction of a graph from its vertex-deleted or edge-deleted subgraphs (in particular, deck checking (DC) and legitimate deck (LD) problems). We show that these problems are closely related for all amounts c≥1 of deletion: 1) GI≡<sup>liso​</sup>VDCc​, GI≡<sup>liso​</sup>EDCc​, GI≤<sup>lm​</sup>LVDc​, and GI≡<sup>piso​</sup>LEDc​. 2) For all k≥2, GI≡<sup>piso​</sup>k−VDCc​ and GI≡<sup>piso​</sup>k−EDCc​. 3) For all k≥2, GI≤<sup>lm​</sup>k−LVDc​. 4)GI≡<sup>piso​</sup>2−LVCc​. 5) For all k≥2, GI≡<sup>piso​</sup>k−LEDc​. For many of these results, even the c=1 case was not previously known. Similar to the definition of reconstruction numbers vrn∃​(G) [HP85] and ern∃​(G) (see page 120 of [LS03]), we introduce two new graph parameters, vrn∀​(G) and ern∀​(G), and give an example of a family Gn​<em>n≥4 of graphs on n vertices for which $vrn</em>{\exists}(G_n) < vrn_{\forall}(G_n)$. For every k≥2 and n≥1, we show that there exists a collection of k graphs on (2<sup>k−1+1)n+k vertices with 2<sup>n 1-vertex-preimages, i.e., one has families of graph collections whose number of 1-vertex-preimages is huge relative to the size of the graphs involved.