Characterize the weight filtration via stabilized root multiplicities

Determine whether, for every simple regular holonomic $D_X$-module $S$, its localization $M=S_f\neq 0$ along a holomorphic function $f$, every complex number $\alpha$, and every nonnegative integer $\ell$, the weight-filtration piece satisfies \[ W_{q+\ell}(M\cdot f^{-\alpha})=D_X\cdot\{mf^{-\alpha}\mid \nu_{m,\alpha}\leq \ell\}, \] where $q$ is the weight of $S$ and $\nu_{m,\alpha}$ is the stabilized multiplicity of the root $s=-\alpha$ in the power $b$-functions of $m$ with respect to $f$.

Background

The paper defines the numerical invariant νm,α\nu_{m,\alpha} from the eventual multiplicity of s=−αs=-\alpha in the power Bernstein–Sato polynomials of an element mm of the localized DD-module M=SfM=S_f. The associated sets Nℓ={mf−α∣νm,α≤ℓ}N_\ell=\{mf^{-\alpha}\mid \nu_{m,\alpha}\leq\ell\} are shown to be quasi-coherent OXO_X-submodules contained in the corresponding weight-filtration pieces Wq+ℓ(M⋅f−α)W_{q+\ell}(M\cdot f^{-\alpha}).

The authors prove equality after applying the DXD_X-action in the lowest weight level and at the top level, and establish equality in several special settings, including isolated quasihomogeneous singularities, hyperplane arrangements, and spherical varieties. The unresolved issue is whether the DXD_X-submodule generated by each NℓN_\ell always equals the full weight-filtration piece.

References

Do we always have $W_{q+\ell}(M\cdot f{-\alpha})=D_X\cdot {mf{-\alpha}\mid \nu_{m,\alpha}\leq \ell}$?

— Filtrations on D-modules and multiplicities of roots of Bernstein-Sato polynomials  (2609.05215 - Lorincz et al., 4 Sep 2026) in Question 1, subsection “An approximation of the weight filtration” in Section 4

Is it true that $\mathrm{ord}{s=-\alpha} Z_m\leq \omega{m, \alpha}\,$?

— Filtrations on D-modules and multiplicities of roots of Bernstein-Sato polynomials  (2609.05215 - Lorincz et al., 4 Sep 2026) in Question 3, subsection “Pole orders of the Archimedean zeta function” in Section 6