Validity of ‘generic n’ arguments near the largest expressible natural number

Ascertain whether the standard diagonalization-style reasoning that rules out an n-bit program deciding halting for all n-bit programs should be accepted for generic n when n approaches the largest expressible natural number under finite information constraints.

Background

The author considers a finite-information viewpoint in which there may be a largest expressible natural number. Within this framework, classical diagonalization arguments used in theorems like the Space Hierarchy Theorem suggest that, for a fixed size bound n, no program can decide halting for all programs of size n.

While such arguments hold for modest n, the author notes that when n nears the largest expressible number, the argument cannot literally be carried out, raising doubt about whether the ‘generic n’ reasoning remains justified in that regime.

References

However, when n gets close to the largest expressible natural number, the argument cannot be carried out so it is unclear whether we should accept the argument for 'generic' n or not.

A Finitist's Manifesto: Do we need to Reformulate the Foundations of Mathematics?  (2009.06485 - Lenchner, 2020) in Section 2: A Prior Crisis at the Foundations