Validate SCDP models in crystalline materials

Establish whether Scalable Charge Density Prediction (SCDP) models—built on an orbital-based charge density representation with even-tempered Gaussian-type orbitals, bond-midpoint virtual orbitals, learnable exponent scaling factors, and an eSCN equivariant backbone—achieve accurate charge density prediction for crystalline materials by rigorously validating performance on crystal structures.

Background

The paper introduces Scalable Charge Density Prediction (SCDP) models that combine virtual orbitals, expressive even-tempered Gaussian basis sets with learnable exponent scaling, and a high-capacity equivariant neural network (eSCN) to predict molecular charge densities efficiently and accurately. On the QM9 molecular benchmark, SCDP achieves state-of-the-art accuracy with significantly improved efficiency over probe-based methods.

While the authors argue that Gaussian-type orbitals and the equivariant architecture can be applied to crystalline materials and suggest potential strategies to adapt virtual node placement (e.g., using CrystalNN or Voronoi-based algorithms), they explicitly note that the approach’s effectiveness in crystalline settings has not yet been validated, making this an outstanding question.

References

While our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on the QM9 charge density prediction benchmark, its effectiveness in crystalline materials has yet to be validated.

A Recipe for Charge Density Prediction (2405.19276 - Fu et al., 29 May 2024) in Section 5 (Discussion), Limitations item (2)