Universality of the internal-to-kinetic energy conversion rate

Determine whether the mean conversion rate from internal energy to kinetic energy by compressions and expansions, expressed nondimensionally as $C_{I\rightarrow E}H^4/\nu^3$ in three-dimensional weakly compressible Rayleigh–Bénard convection, depends only on the Rayleigh and Prandtl numbers rather than on additional thermodynamic properties of the fluid.

Background

The paper argues that, in weakly compressible three-dimensional convection, the kinetic energy is forced by the conversion of internal energy into kinetic energy through compressions and expansions. For the Reynolds number to depend only on RaRa and PrPr, as in the standard Boussinesq formulation, the nondimensional conversion rate CI→EH4/ν3C_{I\rightarrow E}H^4/\nu^3 must likewise be a function only of those two parameters.

The author explicitly states that it is unknown whether this universality is plausible. Resolving the issue would establish whether additional thermodynamic parameters—such as properties related to the ratio of specific heats—must enter the description of statistically stationary convection.

References

The Reynolds number can therefore be a function only of $ Ra $ and $ Pr $ if $ C_{I\rightarrow E} H4/\nu3$ is a function only of $ Ra $ and $ Pr $. Is this plausible? We have to admit that we simply don't know.

As far as the author can see, there is, however, no reason to believe that the two main assumptions of \citet{Kraichnan62} are strictly valid in this universal sense. He just made two very clever guesses, leading to two predictions, (\ref{Main}) and (\ref{TNu}), which turned out to match very well with experimental data. To what extent are his assumptions valid?