Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tighten bounds for EFd and PROPd in group fair division

Determine tight asymptotic bounds on the minimum d guaranteeing the existence of envy-freeness up to d items, EF(n1,...,nk), and proportionality up to d items, PROP(n1,...,nk), in the k-group setting by closing the gaps between the best known upper bounds and the new lower bounds established here, namely Ω(√(n/(k ln k)) for EF and Ω(√(n/(k^3 ln k))) as well as Ω(√(min{n1,...,nk}/ln k)) for PROP.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

For group fair division with n agents partitioned into k groups, the paper establishes new lower bounds: EFd may be infeasible for d in Ω(√(n/(k ln k))), while PROPd may be infeasible for d in Ω(√(n/(k3 ln k))) and also Ω(√(min{n1,...,nk}/ln k)).

Known positive results (e.g., EFd allocations exist for d in O(√n)) imply larger remaining gaps than in the discrepancy/CD case. The authors explicitly identify closing these gaps as open problems.

References

There is still a small gap of $\Theta(\sqrt{\ln{k})$ from the currently known upper bounds for multi-color discrepancy and consensus division, and larger gaps for the other two fair division properties. Closing these gaps are the obvious open problems that stem from our work.

A new lower bound for multi-color discrepancy with applications to fair division (2502.10516 - Caragiannis et al., 14 Feb 2025) in Section 5 (Conclusion)