Systematic detection of clinically inverted feature effects

Develop an established method for systematically detecting clinically implausible reversals in which machine-learning models associate worse disease characteristics with lower predicted risk.

Background

The paper shows that unconstrained XGBoost, logistic regression, and random-forest models can learn associations opposite to established medical knowledge, such as assigning lower bladder-cancer recurrence risk to higher tumour stage or carcinoma in situ. These reversals were not detected by discrimination, calibration, or SHAP-based explanations. The authors present their counterfactual direction test as a framework for detecting such failures, but frame the broader methodological gap as the absence of an established systematic detection method.

References

Such reversals are found only by chance, and no established method exists to detect them systematically.