Short-block conclusion without a large prime factor

Establish whether the conclusion of Lemma 5.1 holds for all but o(X) integers n≤X without assuming that the largest prime factor P(n) exceeds n^{1-α}.

Background

Lemma 5.1 shows that, when P(n)>n{1-α}, every two-block factorial-square representation satisfying the paper’s hypotheses has both block lengths smaller than nε. The proof relies on writing n=ap with a small denominator and exploiting the resulting rational relation between the two blocks.

The authors leave unresolved whether an analogous short-block conclusion holds for almost all integers n≤X when no large-prime-factor hypothesis is imposed.

References

Does the conclusion of Lemma~\ref{lem:short} hold for all but o(X) integers n\le X, without the assumption P(n)>n{1-\alpha}?

— Square products of factorials and a conjecture of Erdős and Graham  (2610.01899 - Yudin, 1 Oct 2026) in Section 6, Further questions; Lemma 5.1 is in Section 4, Long blocks