Rigorous characterization of the size of \(\mathfrak{F}(N)\)

Prove rigorously the empirically observed behavior of the cardinality \(|\mathfrak{F}(N)|\), where \(\mathfrak{F}(N)\) is the set of integers \(r\) for which there exists a divisor \(f\) of \(Nr+1\) satisfying \([\mathcal{X}(N,r,f)]>0\), particularly the reported relation for prime \(N\) involving \((\phi(N)-2)/(2(\log\log N-C_N))\).

Background

The paper defines F(N)\mathfrak{F}(N) as the set of distinct integers rr for which some divisor ff of Nr+1Nr+1 yields a set X(N,r,f)\mathcal{X}(N,r,f) consisting entirely of positive integers. For prime NN, empirical data suggest that F(N)|\mathfrak{F}(N)| is substantially smaller than the elementary upper bound (ϕ(N)2)/2(\phi(N)-2)/2 as NN grows.

The authors introduce a quantity CNC_N through the empirical relation F(N)=(ϕ(N)2)/(2(loglogNCN))|\mathfrak{F}(N)|=(\phi(N)-2)/(2(\log\log N-C_N)) and report that CNC_N appears to increase with NN. Establishing this observed behavior rigorously is explicitly identified as unresolved.

References

Proving rigorously the observed behaviour of $|\mathfrak{F}(N)|$ is left as an {\bf open issue}.

A Problem on the largest divisor $d$ of $N$ with $d\leq \sqrt{N}$  (2609.08596 - Cherukupally, 8 Sep 2026) in Introduction, Combinatorial aspect; Section 5, subsection “The size of \(\mathfrak{F}(N)\) when \(N\) is prime”