Nonlinear shape–colour resonance as the mechanism limiting global linearisation

Determine whether shape–colour resonance, rather than orbit curvature or non-sharing, is the mechanism that prevents global linearisation of neural colour representations, particularly as phase organisation destabilises in deeper layers.

Background

The paper finds that local, phase-conditioned transporters substantially outperform global operator families on colour orbits. A leave-one-shape-out experiment succeeds at a mid-level site but fails at a deeper site, where phase organisation is less stable. These observations are consistent with a resonance-based explanation in which the interaction between shape and colour makes a single global operator inadequate.

However, the authors explicitly label this interpretation as a hypothesis rather than an established result. The unresolved issue is therefore whether the depth-dependent failure of global linearisation is specifically caused by shape–colour resonance, as opposed to curvature, loss of cross-shape sharing, or another source of representational variation.

References

One mechanism hypothesis fits this evidence: the obstacle to global linearisation is shape--colour resonance rather than curvature or non-sharing. Leave-one-shape-out linearisation succeeds $4/4$ at the mid-level site and fails $2/4$ at the deep site, exactly where phase organisation destabilises --- the signature a resonance account predicts. It is stated as a hypothesis, not a result.

— Transformation Laws in Neural Representations: Structure, Realisability, and Construction  (2609.18190 - Sun, 16 Sep 2026) in Section 5.3, “Local state-conditioned realisations”; related discussion in Section 6.2