Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Role of quantum versus classical logic in deriving the classical limit

Determine whether and in what precise manner the non-distributive Hilbert-space quantum logic, contrasted with the Boolean set-theoretic logic of classical physics, can be leveraged to derive deterministic classical physical laws from quantum theory and to clarify the quantum–classical transition.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The paper highlights a fundamental conceptual gap between quantum and classical descriptions: quantum logic formulated on Hilbert spaces is non-distributive, whereas classical physics relies on Boolean set-theoretic logic. The authors suggest that this qualitative difference may be central to understanding how classical deterministic laws emerge from quantum theory but note that a direct logical route remains elusive.

In lieu of a purely logical resolution, the work proposes an interpolation via open-system dynamics and renormalization-group coarse-graining. Nonetheless, the question of whether the logical distinction itself can provide a formal solution remains explicitly unresolved.

References

It has actually been noticed long time ago that the Hilbert space based quantum logic is non-distributive as opposed to the set theory based Boolean logic of classical physics [1,2]. However it is still an open question how such a difference may help us to solve the problem.

Classical limit of a scalar quantum field theory (2510.18025 - Nagy et al., 20 Oct 2025) in Section 1, Introduction