Quantify selection bias as candidate pipelines increase
Determine how quickly selection bias grows as the number of candidate machine-learning pipelines increases relative to the effective sample size, and establish when a large untouched test set is sufficient versus when nested assessment remains necessary.
References
A related open question is how quickly selection bias grows as the number of candidate pipelines increases relative to N_eff. More quantitative guidance is needed to separate settings where a large untouched test set is sufficient from those where nested assessment remains necessary.
Although the differences across encoder families (Tab.~\ref{tab:audit}) suggest broader implications for architecture exploration, whether reuse of evaluation data in related optimization procedures produces similar optimism remains an open question.