Distinguish the relations induced by all power-map digraphs and power-preserving bijections

Prove or disprove that there exist finite groups G and H such that the power-map digraphs of G and H are isomorphic for every exponent t, while no bijection between G and H simultaneously preserves all power maps.

Background

The paper defines G∼₂H to mean that there is a single bijection φ:G→H satisfying φ(gᵗ)=φ(g)ᵗ for every element g and every exponent t. It defines G∼₅H to mean that, for each t, the functional graphs of the power maps g↦gᵗ on G and H are isomorphic, with the isomorphism allowed to depend on t.

Theorem 1 establishes P₂=P₃=P₄≤P₅ for all finite groups, while Theorem 4 establishes P₂=P₃=P₄=P₅ for finite nilpotent groups. The unresolved issue is whether the equality P₂=P₅ extends from nilpotent groups to all finite groups, equivalently whether P₅<P₂ can occur.

References

To this end, we propose some open problems. The first one seeks to decide whether Theorem~\ref{thm:newmain} holds for the class of all finite groups. Prove or disprove: there exist finite groups $G, H$ such that $G\sim_5 H$ but $G\not\sim_2 H$.

— On a class of combinatorial group invariants  (2609.20516 - Fernandes et al., 17 Sep 2026) in Section 6, first Problem after the introductory paragraph on open problems