Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

P versus NC^1: explicit super-logarithmic depth lower bound

Establish the existence of an explicit Boolean function f: {0,1}^n -> {0,1} whose depth complexity under fan-in-2 AND/OR/NOT circuits (equivalently, De Morgan formulas) grows super-logarithmically with n, thereby separating P from NC^1.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The paper studies depth lower bounds for Boolean formulas and circuits, with a focus on compositions and restricted top layers. Despite progress on restricted models, the central challenge remains proving super-logarithmic depth for an explicit function in the standard fan-in-2 model.

Achieving such a depth lower bound would resolve the P versus NC1 problem. The authors note that the best known unconditional lower bounds are only (3−o(1))·log n, underscoring how far the field is from a complete resolution.

References

One of the major open problems in complexity theory is to demonstrate an explicit function which requires super logarithmic depth, a.k.a, the \mathbf{P} versus \mathbf{NC1} problem.

A nearly-$4\log n$ depth lower bound for formulas with restriction on top (2404.15613 - Wu, 24 Apr 2024) in Abstract