Optimality of the estimate in Theorem \ref{thm-Domar-A-B}

Determine whether, under the assumptions of Theorem \ref{thm-Domar-A-B} (bounded open Ω ⊂ R^k; closed B ⊂ R^k; compact p_*‑admissible A ⊂ Ω with m(A)=0; continuously differentiable g; and the constructed functions \mu_{ad}, \mu_{ad}^{−}, and \rho_{ad}), the bound u(x) ≤ a^{\rho_{ad}^{−}(dist(x, B)/(3D))} for x ∈ Ω \ B is optimal, or whether it can be improved under the same hypotheses.

Background

Theorem \ref{thm-Domar-A-B} applies quantitative Domar methods to the paper’s main growth-transfer problem, producing an explicit bound for subharmonic u in terms of distance to B with a function \rho_{ad} derived from the admissibility of A and the growth of g.

The authors question whether this derived bound represents a sharp estimate or if stronger bounds (e.g., closer to g(C dist(x,B))) are attainable without strengthening assumptions.

References

We end the article with the following open questions. Is the estimate in Theorem~\ref{thm-Domar-A-B} optimal?

Self-improving estimates of growth of subharmonic and analytic functions (2508.04496 - Bello et al., 6 Aug 2025) in Question 3, end of Section 5 (Application of quantitative Domar's results to our problem)