O-freeness of imaginary cuspidal algebras and their Gelfand–Graev truncations

Determine whether the imaginary cuspidal algebra \hat C_{d,\mathcal O} and the Gelfand–Graev idempotent truncation C_{d,\mathcal O}=f_d\,\hat C_{d,\mathcal O}\,f_d are \mathcal O-free (torsion-free) as \mathcal O-modules for a principal ideal domain \mathcal O. Equivalently, ascertain whether all graded components of \hat C_{d,\mathcal O} and C_{d,\mathcal O} are free \mathcal O-modules so that graded dimensions do not depend on the characteristic after base change to a field.

Background

Section 6.4 studies integral forms and base change from a principal ideal domain \mathcal O to a field F. While base change is straightforward for many objects (e.g., F\otimes_{\mathcal O} R_{d,\mathcal O} \cong R_{d,F} and F\otimes_{\mathcal O} C_{d,\mathcal O} \cong C_{d,F}), establishing \mathcal O-freeness is subtler and essential for characteristic-independent graded dimensions.

The algebra \hat C_{d} is the imaginary cuspidal algebra (a quotient of the quiver Hecke superalgebra), and C_{d}=f_d\,\hat C_{d}\,f_d is its Gelfand–Graev idempotent truncation. The authors note that R_{d,\mathcal O} is known to be \mathcal O-free, and they do establish freeness for the quotient _{d,j,\mathcal O}, but they do not prove freeness for \hat C_{d,\mathcal O} or C_{d,\mathcal O}. Clarifying the \mathcal O-freeness of these two algebras would strengthen integral results and ensure uniform behavior under base change.

References

What is often more difficult to see is that $X_$ is $$-free, and so a priori the (graded) dimension of $X_F$ might depend on the characteristic of $F$. For example, even though $R_{d,}$ is $$-free, we will not be able to prove the same for its quotient $\hat C_{d,}$ or the idempotent truncation $C_{d,}$ of $\hat C_{d,}$. However, we will establish the freeness for the quotient $_{d,j,}$.

Imaginary Schur-Weyl duality for quiver Hecke superalgebras  (2411.02735 - Kleshchev, 2024) in Section 6.4 (Base change), first paragraph