Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Non-vanishing of the dimension of the invariant subalgebra A^D

Determine whether the pivotal dimension d(A^D) is nonzero for the invariant subobject A^D obtained as the image of the idempotent ρ(e_D) in End_C(A), where C is a modular tensor category, A is a condensable algebra in C, C_A is the fusion category of right A-modules, D is a fusion subcategory of C_A containing the local A-modules C, and ρ: K(C_A) → End_C(A) is the fusion action defined via generalized Frobenius–Schur indicators. In particular, ascertain whether d(A^D) ≠ 0 holds whenever D has positive (Frobenius–Perron) dimension, so that A^D is automatically condensable without additional assumptions.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

Given a condensable algebra A in a modular tensor category C, the authors define a fusion action ρ of the Grothendieck algebra K(C_A) on A. For a fusion subcategory D ⊆ C_A containing the local A-modules C, they form the central idempotent e_D and define AD to be the image of ρ(e_D) in End_C(A).

To identify AD as a condensable subalgebra, the proof requires that its pivotal dimension d(AD) be nonzero. While this is immediate in the pseudounitary setting used later for the bijection, the nonvanishing of d(AD) is not established in general, and the authors explicitly flag this as unclear. They note that it “has to be” nonzero if D has positive dimension, but leave this unproven at that point.

References

It is unclear whether d(AD) \ne 0, but it has to be if \mathcal{D} has positive dimensions.

Generalized Symmetries From Fusion Actions (2508.13063 - Dong et al., 18 Aug 2025) in Section 5 (Galois correspondence from fusion actions), preceding Proposition 5.2 (p:subalgebra)