Fundamental nature of sub-Neptune exoplanets
Determine whether sub-Neptune exoplanets (temperate exoplanets with sizes between Earth and Neptune) are more similar to (i) terrestrial planets with thin atmospheres and potentially habitable surfaces, (ii) mini-Neptunes that are less massive analogs of Solar System ice giants with deep hydrogen–helium atmospheres lacking a habitable surface, or (iii) intermediate volatile-rich configurations such as water worlds with substantial H2O interiors.
References
Because a range of interior compositions can explain the observed masses and radii of sub-Neptunes, it is unknown whether these planets are closer to (1) terrestrial planets with thin atmospheres and potentially habitable surfaces, (2) “mini-Neptunes” which are less massive versions of our solar system’s ice giants, or (3) “in-between state” planets, such as “water worlds” with volatile-rich interiors.
For all planet samples, there are multiple volatile scenarios that can reasonably reproduce the observed density distributions and are not rejected by the KS and AD tests. This indicates that current data do not provide sufficient statistical leverage to distinguish whether the low-density population is dominated by water-rich planets, gas-rich planets, or a mixture of both.
While our helium absorption nondetections cast doubt on the helium-dominated upper atmosphere interpretation of LHS 1140 b, it does not constrain the relative likelihood of LHS 1140 b being a mini-Neptune versus a water world. We leave this to future, panchromatic analyses of LHS 1140 b's transmission spectrum, coupled with emission photometry results from the Rocky Worlds DDT program for this target.