Minimax optimality of basic f-composable schedules

Establish that for every number of iterations n ≥ 1, every minimax optimal stepsize sequence for gradient descent that minimizes the final objective gap over L-smooth convex functions and initializations with distance at most D from a minimizer (i.e., a solution to min_{h ∈ R^n} max_{(f,x0) ∈ F_{L,D}} f(x_n) − inf f) is a basic stepsize schedule constructed via the f-, g-, and s-join composition operations and is f-composable.

Background

The paper introduces three composable families of stepsize schedules (f-, g-, and s-composable) and corresponding composition operations (f-join, g-join, s-join) that allow building complex schedules from simpler ones while preserving tight convergence guarantees.

Using these operations, the authors show that all numerically computed minimax-optimal schedules for n ≤ 25 from Gupta et al. can be represented (up to small numerical error) as basic schedules. Motivated by this empirical finding, they pose a conjecture asserting that true minimax-optimal schedules are basic and f-composable, which would imply that the optimized basic f-composable schedules (OBS-F) produced by their dynamic programming procedure are information-theoretically optimal.

References

This strong relation between every numerically identified minimax optimal pattern and basic patterns motivates the following natural conjecture. Conjecture For each $n$, every minimax optimal stepsize schedule, solving~eq:minimax, is basic and $f$-composable.

— Composing Optimized Stepsize Schedules for Gradient Descent  (2410.16249 - Grimmer et al., 2024) in Conjecture (Conjecture~\ref{conj:strong-f-minimax-descripiton}), Section “Numerically Minimax Optimal Stepsizes for n=1,…,25”

Some readers might wonder how we should select the checkpoint steps. We do not have a definitive answer.

— Stronger Lower Bounds for (Non-)Anytime Acceleration of Gradient Descent  (2609.04032 - Jung et al., 3 Sep 2026) in Section “Lower Bounds via Top-k Checkpoint Selection”

The result gives a full phase law but not a closed form for $\Psi_F$. Its exact extrema, uniqueness of the extremizing phases, and the asymptotic geometry of maximizing pivots remain open quantitative problems.

— Optimal Recursive Composition and Dyadic Phase Laws for Gradient Descent with Predetermined Stepsizes  (2609.11788 - Liu et al., 10 Sep 2026) in Section 6, subsection “Strict support separation and the complete phase law”

The OBS-F minimax conjecture of \citet{GrimmerShuWangMOR}, the exact finite-horizon minimax behavior beyond the recursive classes, and transfers to proximal or composite optimization \citep{BokAltschulerCOLT,BokAltschulerMP} remain separate questions.

— Optimal Recursive Composition and Dyadic Phase Laws for Gradient Descent with Predetermined Stepsizes  (2609.11788 - Liu et al., 10 Sep 2026) in Remark Scope, Section 1; reiterated in Section 6 and the Conclusion