Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Cross-cultural validity of the values elicitation process (MGE)

Ascertain how effectively the Moral Graph Elicitation values elicitation process operates in countries with very different cultures—specifically Nigeria, China, and the United Arab Emirates—by evaluating whether it can successfully elicit and reconcile values to produce a moral graph comparable to the U.S. case study.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The paper’s case paper evaluates Moral Graph Elicitation (MGE) with a representative sample of 500 Americans and reports promising results across multiple criteria (legitimacy, robustness, fine-grainedness, generalizability, and scalability).

However, the authors note that cultural differences may materially affect the elicitation and reconciliation of values. They explicitly flag uncertainty about MGE’s performance in non-U.S. contexts and cite Nigeria, China, and the UAE as examples, indicating a need for further validation beyond the U.S. sample.

References

Even though we found value convergence for contentious topics like abortion across the political spectrum, it remains to be seen how well our values elicitation process works in countries with very different cultures, like Nigeria, China, and the United Arab Emirates.

What are human values, and how do we align AI to them? (2404.10636 - Klingefjord et al., 27 Mar 2024) in Subsection “Limitations” (Case Study), Section Discussion