Mechanistic explanation for cluster-count sensitivity
Determine the mechanism responsible for the pronounced sensitivity of FreqMask-KM’s adversarial-slice performance to the number of clusters, particularly for the Ministral representation.
References
The Ministral row still shows large fluctuation outside its $N = 50$ peak, driven by the adversarial slice collapsing at $N \in {25, 100, 200, 500}$; we do not have a mechanistic explanation and read it as a sensitivity of Ministral's representation geometry to $N$ rather than as noise.
— Local Sparsity Enables Unsupervised LLM Safety Detection
(2609.20129 - Chen et al., 17 Sep 2026) in Appendix, Section ‘Ablations: Stage-by-Stage Variations on FreqMask-KM’, subsection ‘Number of Clusters’