Long-term cognitive and skill impacts of pervasive AI assistance
Ascertain the long-term effects of widespread AI assistance and integration of generative AI tools on human learning, skill acquisition, and retention across educational and professional settings, particularly in contexts where individuals offload complex cognitive tasks to AI.
References
While the long-term effects of this phenomenon remain unclear, there is a growing concern about deskilling and learning in the age of AI \citep{natali2025ai, choudhury2024large, lee2025impact}.
A central question becomes whether AI systems strengthen human capacity over time or quietly replace the effort through which that capacity is built.
And what, if anything, do platforms owe the workers whose skills their task structures wear down?
Although the results suggest that trace-based support improves revision performance and usability, we do not yet know whether these benefits translate into durable learning or long-term skill development.
For HCI researchers and designers: how can we shape the platforms and task structures of gig work to preserve skill development as AI takes over production?
We also do not yet know how prolonged use of proactive recovery support would affect learning, trust calibration, or dependence on assistance over time.
For example, it remains unknown whether practitioners who currently absorb'' the loss of generative joy will eventually experience long-term burnout or attrition, or whether the fearedskill atrophy'' will actually materialize and impact code quality over a 3-to-5-year period.