Linear maximum-degree conditions for exact asymmetric Ramsey numbers
Determine whether the exact asymmetric Ramsey-number conclusion of Theorem 1, namely R(T,S)=\underline{R}(T,S) for trees satisfying s_2\geq t_2 and \nu\geq t_1, remains valid when the sublinear maximum-degree assumptions \Delta(T)\leq cn/\log n and \Delta(S)\leq c\nu/\log\nu are replaced by the linear bounds \Delta(T)\leq cn and \Delta(S)\leq c\nu.
References
Can the conditions $\Delta(T)\leq cn/\log n$ and $\Delta(S)\leq c\nu/\log\nu$ in Theorem~\ref{thm:main} be replaced with $\Delta(T)\leq cn$ and $\Delta(S)\leq c\nu$?
— Asymmetric Ramsey numbers of trees
(2511.15673 - Yan, 19 Nov 2025) in Question 1, Section "Concluding remarks" (Section 6)