Exactness of the general lower bound for more tree pairs

Decide for more families of pairs of trees (T,S) whether the general lower bound R(T,S)\geq\underline{R}(T,S) is tight, that is, whether R(T,S)=\underline{R}(T,S).

Background

The paper proves equality with the general lower bound for a large family of pairs satisfying maximum-degree and bipartition-size conditions, and gives a bounded-degree result when the order of T is sufficiently larger than that of S. The concluding question asks for further families beyond those treated by these results for which the lower bound is exact.

References

Decide for more families of pairs of trees $(T,S)$ whether $R(T,S)=\underline{R}(T,S)$.

Asymmetric Ramsey numbers of trees  (2511.15673 - Yan, 19 Nov 2025) in Final Question, Section "Concluding remarks" (Section 6)