Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Define likelihoods for estimation in non-dominated models

Develop a general framework for defining a likelihood function that supports estimation procedures such as maximum likelihood estimation in statistical model families that lack a common dominating measure, for example when comparing or combining discrete and continuous distributions, where no hypothesis-based construction (such as an effective null) is available.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The paper critiques a universalist commitment to Likelihoodism by highlighting settings where standard likelihood-based tools are ill-defined. When a model family contains distributions that are not jointly dominated by a single measure (e.g., comparing a continuous distribution against a discrete distribution), the usual construction of the likelihood function breaks down.

While recent work proposes an effective-null construction to enable hypothesis testing in such settings, the authors emphasize that estimation problems (e.g., maximum likelihood estimation) remain unresolved because there are no hypotheses to anchor the construction. This leaves an explicit gap: a general approach to define likelihoods for estimation in non-dominated models.

References

In composite setting, kind of, but there are settings where we do not know (yet) how to define a likelihood function. The problem remains for general estimation endeavours (such as MLE), where it is not clear how one should define the likelihood function as then we do not have hypotheses.

My Statistics is Better than Yours (2412.10296 - Benhaïem, 13 Dec 2024) in Section 4.1, The universalist approach to choosing a normative system