Justification of the transformed labelled Dyson equation
Justify the labelled stochastic differential equation for the transformed infinite-dimensional Dyson Brownian motion with parameters \(\gamma_1\) and \(\gamma_2\), including its principal-value interaction and the time-dependent drift term, for \(0<t<1/\gamma_2\).
References
We leave justifying eq ISDE gamma_2 as an open problem.
eq ISDE gamma_2:
$\difX_i\left(t\right)=\dif\widetilde{B}_i\left(t\right) +\left\{\operatorname{PV}\sum_{j\ne i} \frac1{X_i\left(t\right)-X_j\left(t\right)} -\frac{\gamma_1-p_b\left(\right)+\gamma_2X_i\left(t\right)} {1-\gamma_2t}\right\}\dif t. $
The construction at $\beta=2$ leaves open the problem of identifying labelled equations for very dense initial configurations and for $\gamma_2>0$. This requires an appropriate summation or renormalisation of the interaction.
A related question is to find an intrinsic analytic class for the Stieltjes equation and prove initial-value uniqueness which also identifies its evolving poles, without assuming the regular particle representation and continuation properties of Proposition~\ref{prop:pole-recovery}.
It would be interesting to develop this and we leave this as an open problem.