Extension of the principal-value representation of \(\mathsf{X}_1(w)\) to complex parameters

Establish whether the representation of the Hua–Pickrell random variable \(\mathsf{X}_1(w)\) as the almost-sure limit of the truncated difference between the positive and negative points of the determinantal point process \(\mathcal{C}^{(w)}\) remains valid for all nonreal parameters \(w\in\mathbb{C}\setminus\mathbb{R}\).

Background

For real parameters ww with $2w>-1$, Qiu’s result identifies X1(w)\mathsf{X}_1(w) almost surely with the limit of the truncated difference between the positive and negative points of the determinantal point process C(w)\mathcal{C}^{(w)}. This representation connects the first Hua–Pickrell ergodic parameter γ1\gamma_1 with the point-process coordinates.

The paper explicitly states that the validity of this same representation is not known for nonreal parameters. Such an extension would provide a direct determinantal-point-process description of X1(w)\mathsf{X}_1(w) in the complex-parameter regime, which the paper otherwise studies through Painlevé and analytic methods.

References

To the best of our knowledge, it is unknown whether (\ref{describtionofX1w}) holds for $w\in \mathbb{C}\setminus\mathbb{R}$.

Joint moments of characteristic polynomials in the circular Jacobi ensemble and Painlevé equations  (2608.24423 - Bothner et al., 25 Aug 2026) in Section 1, subsection “Background for the random variable \(\mathsf{X}_1(w)\)”, immediately following equation (\ref{describtionofX1w})