Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Integrate dimension-reduced propensity score methods into doubly robust ATT and DID frameworks

Integrate the kernel-based, dimension-reduced propensity score estimator that uses Kolmogorov–Smirnov conditional-dependence screening with cross-validation refinement into (i) doubly robust estimators of the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) and (ii) modern doubly robust difference-in-differences estimators, extending the current ATE-focused implementation to ATT and DID settings.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The paper develops a data-driven dimension reduction procedure for conditional density and propensity score estimation, combining a Kolmogorov–Smirnov-based conditional dependence screening step with a cross-validation refinement, and applies it to doubly robust ATE estimation.

In the empirical 401(k) illustration, the authors caution that their analysis focuses on ATE, whereas common empirical strategies like difference-in-differences target ATT. They note that a more direct methodological comparison would require embedding their dimension-reduction approach within doubly robust ATT and modern doubly robust DID frameworks, which they do not undertake in this paper.

Consequently, a concrete extension is to incorporate the proposed dimension-reduced propensity score estimator into doubly robust ATT estimation (e.g., as in Shinozaki and Matsuyama, 2015) and into modern doubly robust DID procedures (e.g., Sant’Anna and Zhao, 2020).

References

A more direct comparison would involve integrating our methods into doubly robust ATT estimation (e.g., ) or modern doubly robust DID frameworks (e.g., ). This is beyond the scope of this paper, and we leave it for future research.

Dimension Reduction for Conditional Density Estimation with Applications to High-Dimensional Causal Inference (2507.22312 - Mei et al., 30 Jul 2025) in Section 5 (Empirical Illustration), Empirical Results and Concluding Remarks