Independent field-theory derivation of the logarithmic anomaly coefficient

Derive independently, from boundary field-theory data, the anomaly coefficient \(\mathsf{A}=\sqrt{21}/70\) governing the logarithmic running of the condensate of the dimension-four operator \(\mathcal{O}_{-}\), either through the momentum-space triple-K anomaly of its three-point function or through the Osborn/Callan–Symanzik metric anomaly in the trace sector, thereby fixing the overall normalization.

Background

The paper computes a universal coefficient A=21/70\mathsf{A}=\sqrt{21}/70 for the logarithmic running induced at second order by the irrelevant operator O\mathcal{O}_{-} with dimension Δ=4\Delta=4 in a three-dimensional boundary theory. In the bulk, this coefficient is tied to the cubic coupling V,V_{,---} of the second scalar and appears in the logarithmic term of the induced condensate.

The authors identify the logarithm with a boundary three-point-function anomaly and state that an independent field-theory calculation—using either momentum-space triple-K methods or the Osborn/Callan–Symanzik anomaly—would complete the holographic identification by verifying the normalization.

References

A fully independent evaluation of \mathsf{A} from field-theory data--either from this momentum-space (triple-$K$) anomaly of \langle\mathcal{O}{-}\mathcal{O}{-}\mathcal{O}_{-}\rangle , or equivalently from the Osborn/Callan-Symanzik anomaly in the trace (metric) sector where the \Delta=d+1 anomaly resides--would fix the overall normalization and complete the identification. The homogeneous thermal condensate computed here is the zero-momentum specialization of that correlator, so its scheme-independent slope coincides with the flat-space anomaly coefficient; we leave this cross-check for future work, as eq:anomcubic already exhibits the requisite three-point structure.

Perturbative Double-Scalar Hair on Planar Black Holes in AdS$_{4}$ Einstein-Scalar Gravity  (2609.01332 - Yun, 1 Sep 2026) in Section 4, paragraph “Three-point origin of the slope”; Section 7, Discussion