Determine the origin of the finite imaging offset parameter

Identify the physical origin of the finite reduced offset parameter \(\tilde{c}_2\) in the detection of the cesium \(\ket{2}\) population during state-resolved imaging, after excluding the Cs\(\ket{1}\)\(\leftrightarrow\)Cs\(\ket{2}\) transfer, optical pumping, closed-transition imaging light, and camera-related artifacts.

Background

The experiment determines the transferred fraction between the two lowest cesium hyperfine states by imaging Cs1\ket{1} directly and transferring Cs2\ket{2} into Cs1\ket{1} for a second imaging sequence. The detected Cs2\ket{2} population is modeled heuristically as N2,det=c1N2+c2N_{2,\mathrm{det}}=c_1N_2+c_2, where the offset c2=c~2Nc_2=\tilde{c}_2\overline{N} scales with the total cesium atom number. Calibration yields c1=0.85(3)c_1=0.85(3) and c~2=0.059(0.012)\tilde{c}_2=0.059(0.012).

The authors report that the finite value of the offset parameter cannot be explained by the state-transfer or optical-pumping procedures, nor by the imaging transition light or camera artifacts. Consequently, the physical source of this systematic offset remains unresolved and limits the interpretation and calibration of state-resolved cesium imaging.

References

Despite extensive investigations, we were unable to identify the origin of the finite value of c_2.

The heavy Fermi polaron I: the Lithium-Cesium experiment  (2608.27322 - Rautenberg et al., 27 Aug 2026) in Appendix, Section "Calibration of the imaging parameters" (Section \ref{appendix:doubleimg})