Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Equality of Gutt–Hutchings and Ekeland–Hofer capacities

Determine whether, for every integer k ≥ 1 and for all Liouville domains (or other symplectic domains where both capacities are defined), the k-th Gutt–Hutchings capacity c_k^{GH} equals the k-th Ekeland–Hofer capacity c_k^{EH}. Establishing this equality would connect capacities defined via S^1-equivariant symplectic homology with the classical Ekeland–Hofer capacities across all indices k.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

Gutt and Hutchings defined a sequence of symplectic capacities c_k{GH} (k ≥ 1) using S1-equivariant symplectic homology. The classical sequence of Ekeland–Hofer capacities c_k{EH} arises from variational methods and has been a central tool in symplectic topology.

The paper compares the first relative Gutt–Hutchings capacity with a relative symplectic (co)homology capacity and proves equality under a dynamical convexity assumption, providing evidence toward relationships between different capacity constructions. Nonetheless, the general equality c_k{GH} = c_k{EH} for all k remains conjectural and is explicitly stated as such in the literature.

References

In , Gutt and Hutchings claimed a conjecture that the $k$-th Gutt-Hutchings capacity is equal to the $k$-th Ekeland-Hofer capacity defined in for each $k = 1, 2, 3, \cdots$.

$S^1$-equivariant relative symplectic cohomology and relative symplectic capacities (2410.01977 - Ahn, 2 Oct 2024) in Subsubsection: Comparison of relative symplectic capacities