Exponential succinctness gap over a fixed vocabulary
Determine whether an exponential succinctness gap between three-variable first-order logic and the calculus of relations holds for a family of formulas over a fixed signature, such as a single binary relation symbol.
References
What Corollary~\ref{cor:gap} leaves open is the same question over a vocabulary fixed in advance. The formulas above use $k$ and $2k$ relation symbols respectively, and $|\varphi|=\Theta(k)$ because the size charges an occurrence of a symbol one node; whether an exponential gap holds for a family over a fixed signature we do not know (Remark~\ref{rem:vocabulary}).
— An Exponential Succinctness Gap between Three-Variable Logic and the Calculus of Relations
(2609.26778 - Uezato, 22 Sep 2026) in Section 1, immediately after Corollary 1.3; see also Remark 'The vocabulary grows with k'