Eventual vanishing of unstable cohomology for syzygies of a fixed module

Determine whether, for a given finitely generated module M over a commutative noetherian local ring R, there exists an integer n0 such that U(Ω^n M) = 0 for all n ≥ n0, i.e., whether the kernel of Ext_R(k, Ω^n M) → ẐExt_R(k, Ω^n M) eventually vanishes with n.

Background

The subspace U(M) is defined as the kernel of Ext_R(k,M) → ẐExt_R(k,M), measuring instability of cohomology classes. Lescot’s invariant σ(R) asks for a uniform bound n working for all finitely generated modules; the authors also raise the weaker module-specific question of eventual vanishing of U(Ωn M).

While the authors prove finiteness of σ(R) for many classes of rings, they explicitly note that they do not currently have an answer to the weaker, module-specific question in general.

References

The rest of this work is concerned with this question. For a start, we do not even have an answer for the weaker question: For a finitely generated R-module M, is U(nM)=0 for n≫ 0?

Unstable elements in cohomology and a question of Lescot  (2507.23213 - Iyengar et al., 31 Jul 2025) in Section 4 (The Lescot invariant), immediately before Question (qu:lescotM)