Are Book 1 “things” and Book 5 “magnitudes” the same objects in Euclid’s Elements?

Determine whether the objects referred to as “things” under the common notions in Book 1 of Euclid’s Elements are the same as the “magnitudes” employed in Book 5’s theory of proportions; specifically, ascertain whether line segments, angles, and plane figures are treated as one unified class of magnitudes across both books or whether distinct categories are intended.

Background

The note highlights that Euclid uses the term “common notions” in Book 1 when discussing equality and comparison, and a different term—translated as “magnitudes”—in Book 5 when developing proportion theory. The author observes that the Greek words differ and points out the ambiguity regarding whether these refer to the same kind of mathematical objects.

Clarifying this relationship is central to understanding how Euclid compares and operates on line segments, angles, and figures across the Elements, and whether the framework for proportions consistently applies to the objects introduced earlier.

References

However, in Book 5 Euclid explains the theory of proportions using a different language (“magnitudes” in [english], and indeed it seems that the Greek word is also different), but it is not clear whether things from Book 1 and magnitudes from Book 5 are the same objects.

Comparing angles in Euclid's Elements  (2404.02272 - Shen, 2024) in Main text (after Abstract), paragraph beginning “The first pages of Elements contain ‘common notions’...”