Establish the statistical significance of RaRE’s GPQA Diamond improvement
Establish, through additional training seeds, whether RaRE’s improvement over single-judge Rubrics as Rewards variants on GPQA Diamond is statistically significant and supports a definitive comparison.
References
RaRE's improvement on GPQA Diamond compared to single-judge RaR is not statistically significant across 5 training seeds. Running additional seeds could help tighten confidence intervals and allow for a more definitive comparison, which we leave to future work due to compute constraints.
— Judging the Judges: Confidence and Disagreement in Rubrics as Rewards
(2610.21179 - Liu et al., 15 Oct 2026) in Section Limitations