Equivalence from isometric equivariant forms for closed immersed Z-surfaces
Establish whether closed genus g immersed Z-surfaces with the same numbers of positive and negative transverse double points and with exteriors whose equivariant intersection forms are isometric must be equivalent up to homeomorphism.
References
The situation is less clear in the closed case: while closed embedded Z-surfaces are determined up to equivalence by the equivariant intersection form of their exteriorsTheorem 1.4, and similarly for immersed Z-surfaces with a single double point (Theorem~\ref{thm:Other4ManifoldsSpheresIntro}), the corresponding question for immersed surfaces remains open in general. If two closed genus g immersed Z-surfaces with the same number of positive and negative double points have exteriors whose equivariant intersection forms are isometric, must the surfaces be equivalent?