Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Equivalence from isometric equivariant forms for closed immersed Z-surfaces

Establish whether closed genus g immersed Z-surfaces with the same numbers of positive and negative transverse double points and with exteriors whose equivariant intersection forms are isometric must be equivalent up to homeomorphism.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

For embedded Z-surfaces in closed simply-connected 4-manifolds, the equivariant intersection form of the exterior determines the surface up to equivalence. This paper proves analogous uniqueness for immersed Z-surfaces with a single double point and provides partial results in other settings.

However, when double points are present in the closed case, the authors do not have a general uniqueness theorem. This question asks if isometry of equivariant intersection forms suffices to imply equivalence for closed immersed Z-surfaces with fixed double point counts.

A positive resolution would extend the embedded uniqueness paradigm to the immersed case; a negative resolution would exhibit new phenomena where the equivariant intersection form does not fully determine the topological type of the immersed surface.

References

The situation is less clear in the closed case: while closed embedded Z-surfaces are determined up to equivalence by the equivariant intersection form of their exteriorsTheorem 1.4, and similarly for immersed Z-surfaces with a single double point (Theorem~\ref{thm:Other4ManifoldsSpheresIntro}), the corresponding question for immersed surfaces remains open in general. If two closed genus g immersed Z-surfaces with the same number of positive and negative double points have exteriors whose equivariant intersection forms are isometric, must the surfaces be equivalent?

Immersed surfaces with knot group $\mathbb{Z}$ (2410.04635 - Conway et al., 6 Oct 2024) in Section Open questions