Disentangling effective cooling-time versus cooling-physics dependencies

Determine, by a systematic comparison of constant-β cooling and full radiative-cooling simulations of gravitational instability in protostellar disks, which quantitative outcomes depend solely on the effective cooling time β and which depend on the detailed cooling physics (e.g., optically thin versus optically thick radiative transport).

Background

Many previous simulations of gravitational instability in disks adopt a prescribed constant cooling time (constant β) for simplicity, while real disks cool radiatively with behavior differing in optically thin and optically thick regimes. Without a controlled, side-by-side comparison, it is difficult to know whether reported findings are governed by the overall cooling rate or by the specific cooling mechanism.

This paper highlights the need for a systematic comparison to clarify which results stem from the effective β alone and which intrinsically require the physics of radiative transport.

References

The existing works, however, do not include a systematic comparison between constant-β simulations and radiative simulations, so it is often unclear which results depend only on the overall cooling rate (effective β) and which results depend on the cooling type.

Nevertheless, it remains uncertain whether the shock strengths and thermodynamic structures produced in β-cooling simulations quantitatively reproduce those obtained in radiation hydrodynamic models.

— Cooling-regulated gas accretion onto gap-opening planets  (2608.28019 - Kuwahara et al., 28 Aug 2026) in Section 4.4, β cooling approximation

Several fundamental questions remain open. From a thermodynamic perspective, the self-regulation mechanism in infall-driven discs has so far been characterised only in the isothermal limit (); understanding how a more realistic treatment of disc thermodynamics modifies the self-regulated state is a critical next step.

— Gravitational instability in planet-forming discs  (2609.05080 - Longarini et al., 4 Sep 2026) in Section 5.1.1, Theoretical perspective, p. 20