Dense-regime dynamics and closed-loop adversarial exploitation
Characterize the behavior of the query-aware sentinel admission index beyond the measured competitor-density boundary in the dense regime, including whether a closed-loop adversary can exploit the resulting fragmentation and the gate’s loss of control.
References
That same axis is \emph{open in the dense regime}: past the competitor-density boundary of \S\ref{sec:dense}, fragmentation co-governs and the gate is no longer the controlling factor---a boundary we measure but do not push further (a closed-loop adversary that exploits it is future work).
— Coverage Is Not Redundancy: Maintenance Cost and Exposure of Query-Aware Admission Indexes in Vector Databases Under Workload Drift
(2608.16043 - Pathak, 17 Aug 2026) in Section 7, paragraph “The open axes”; see also Section 8, “Limitations and Threats to Validity”
On the regime/budget axis, the question is open by construction: whether the established floor is operationally significant is undecided until $\tau$ and the budgets are deployment-calibrated.
— Coverage Is Not Redundancy: Maintenance Cost and Exposure of Query-Aware Admission Indexes in Vector Databases Under Workload Drift
(2608.16043 - Pathak, 17 Aug 2026) in Section 7, paragraph “The open axes”; see also Section 7, paragraph “Budget-dependent, by construction”