Define the variational derivative δ_W on deformed charges with commutator terms

Ascertain whether the variational derivative δ_W := (2πi)^2 W[1]W ∂/∂W can be consistently defined on the deformed charges [W^n]_a that arise from the similarity-transformed fields [W]_a = W + a[Λ_0,W] + (a^2/2)[Λ_0,[Λ_0,W]] + …, so that the recursion [W^{n+1}]_a = δ_W · [W^n]_a remains well defined for operators generated by commutator deformations that commute with L_0.

Background

In discussing ambiguities of the operator-level realization of the modular transform, the authors note that one may add commutator terms via a similarity transformation e{D} that commutes with L_0, producing deformed fields [W]_a and higher composites [Wn]_a that now include commutators.

The recursive structure proved in the paper, expressed using the variational derivative δ_W acting on nested products of W, does not immediately extend to such deformed charges because δ_W was defined only on nested products of W, not on expressions with additional commutators. Clarifying whether δ_W can be extended to this larger class is necessary to control the operator-level ambiguity beyond one-point functions.

References

The new fields would appear at first sight from eq:w-deformed to obey the same recursion relation as the one-point functions of the original fields, except that $\delta_W$ is only defined on nested products of $W$, not commutators with further generators and so it is not clear that it can be defined on the deformed charges that appear in eq:w-deformed.

Universal Modular Properties of Generalized Gibbs Ensembles and Chiral Deformations  (2603.28244 - Ashok et al., 30 Mar 2026) in Section 6: Discussion (around Eq. (6.16), Eq. (6.17))